Is it time to end the E-commerce sales tax subsidy?

Filed in Economy | Politics | Responsibility | Social | USA politics

• Maureen Hayden is the Indiana State Reporter for CNHI. Contact her at Maureen.Hayden@indianamediagroup.com.

Normal, Ill. —
Dick Smith thrives on competition. At 69, he braved the heat and sandstorms of the Sahara desert this summer to compete against rivals half his age on ABC’s adventure reality show “Expedition Impossible.”

Smith was edged out before he could reach the finish line, but the retired Army Ranger felt he’d been in a fair fight. He doesn’t say the same for the small-store business climate to which he returned and relies on for his livelihood.

Continue Reading

Article source: http://kokomotribune.com/local/x859492951/E-commerce-raises-question-of-sales-tax-fairness

,

Best of 2010

Filed in Books | Creativity | Entertainment | Social | Social media | Technology | USA politics

It’s that time of year, when everyone was to put out their best of 2010 list. Here is my Best List of the Best of 2010 List.

Let’s start with Esquires 102 things to be proud of in 2010.

 

Best of 2010: Things that made us proud

Esquire

PMA’s Best Songs of 2010

Pretty Much Amazing

10 Best Songs of 2010

AOL Radio

United State of Pop

DJ Earworm

The 10 Best Books of 2010

New York Times

Best of 2010: Books

Miami Herald

Best Feature Films of 2010

Roger Ebert’s Journal from the Sun Times

50 Best Movies of 2010

MovieFone Blog

Best of 2010: TV

TV.com

Best of 2010: Games

Game Spot

Mossberg’s Best and Worst Products of 2010

Walter MossbergAll Things Digital from the Wall Street Journal

The Best of 2010′s Animals in the News

AOL News

Best of 2010: People’s list of lists

People

  Best Blogs of 2010   Time

13 Most Memorable Political Quotes of 2010

Politics Daily

Top Stories from 2010 (VIDEO)

  Huffington Post
  The Best of 2010   Washington Post
  Pictures: 2010 in News   LA Times
  Best Tech Ideas of the Year   David Pogue Personal Tech New York Times
  Best/Worst PR Moves of 2010   PR News Online

 

And we’ll wrap it up with DJ Earworm’s video tribute to the United State of Pop 2010.

Comcast and Level 3 Square Off Over Netflix and Regulation

Filed in Management | Marketing | Responsibility | Social media | Technology | USA politics

Level 3 has decided to take it’s negotiations with Comcast to the masses and the federal government.  The issue is about the cost of delivering content across each other’s networks, or is it? Comcast claims it is a Peering Issue and the Netflix agreement has caused Level 3 to outgrow the settle-free arrangement the two have per Comcast’s Settlement-free Interconnection Policy. They feel level 3 is asking for an unfair advantage over network carriers such as Akamai and Amazon CloudFront.

Level 3 on the other hand, believes this is an issue of customer access and Comcast is increasing these fees to protect the cable TV programming they provide.   In an FAQ to clarify their position Level 3 compares the issue to the 1968 FCC intervention when Bell System attempted to prevent other companies from connecting to existing telephone lines.

The FCC is discussing the issue with both parties.  To complicate the issue further, the FCC is expected to rule on the issue of Net Neutrality soon.  And Comcast is awaiting approval of their merger with NBC Universal. 

Folks from all over have been talking about this.  The Motley Fool placed the issue on the This Week’s 5 Dumbest Stock Moves, somewhat ambiguously indicating it was Level 3’s move causing the listing.

Law & Disorder lays out the issues in “How Comcast became a toll-collecting, nuke-wielding hydra”, complete with naming of the name callers.

Digital Trends also has a good overview of the week’s activity and no word on what a solution may look like. “It’s not clear how the dispute between the two companies can be resolved. For now, Level 3 is paying Comcast’s additional fees so that customers don’t see a disruption in service. However, by going public with its position, Level 3 is hoping to influence public opinion and federal policymakers into mandating “forced interconnection on fair terms”—and notes the FCC has intervened in a case where telephone operators blocked broadband subscribers from accessing VoIP phone services.”

Social Media Implications

Comcast was early to get their position out on their ComcastVoices Twitter account.  Pointing listeners to their open letter to the FCC, they were not about to garner much online support. 

Level 3 does not seem to be participating in Social Media.  My quick searches have not found them participating at all and certainly not around this issue.  That does not mean they are not ahead in the game.  Underdog and all that seems to be working.

Most replies to @comcastvoices suggested Comcast should back off and make no changes to their agreement with Level 3.  There are 2 groups and 2 pages asking for Comcast to stop blocking Netflix on Facebook.  There are roughly 60 people likeing the pages and joining the groups.  It may be the same 60. I wonder how much of this stems from the belief that Netflixs online costs will go up for Comcast customers.

Let me know what you think about Level 3’s decision to make this a public appeal to folks, primarily Comcast subscribers?  How well you think Comcast has responded? 

In the meantime, I’ll keep my eye on how the two are using (or ignoring) the public commentary on the social airwaves.

Barack Obama – 44th President of the United States of America

Filed in Politics | USA politics

“America, in the face of our common dangers; in this winter of our hardship let us remember these timeless words. With hope and virtue, let us brace once more the icy currents. An endure what storms may come. Let it be said by our children’s chirdren, that when we were tested we refused to let this journey end. That we did not turn back nor did we falter and with eyes fixed on the horizon and god’s grace upon us, we carried forth that great gift of freedom and delivered it safely to future generations.”

,

Plug-in Hybrid Retrofit Plan

Filed in Energy | USA politics

Andy Grove has a plan to test the viability of retrofitting US autos into plug-in hybrids fashioned along the lines of GM’s Volt design. He suggest testing this on 1 million cars at a cost of about $10 billion mainly due to the continued high cost for batteries ($10,000 per car). He is also pushing Intel to get back into the battery business, suggesting he sees this idea as more than just idle speculation.

Grove wants to focus on retrofitting a few high volume, low mileage models to test the theory. His goal is to reduce the dependency of our transportation system on petroleum and therefore foreign interests by moving more of our transportation miles to rely on electricity. Arguing that electricity is generated using a variety of fuel sources and a higher carbon productivity rate, this will also reduce GHGs emissions.

His article received a significant amount of feedback encouraging him to prepare a response only a few days after the original was posted. Primary concerns of those writing in were:

Electricity Generation

Electrical Grid Capacity

Small Impact of 1 million Cars

Getting Political Support

and one reader who suggested he stick to his knitting and leave energy to others.

, ,

Obama Represents a New Day in America

Filed in USA politics

All Americans can be proud that the country we love has taken a giant leap forward with the election of Barak Obama.  And African Americans should truly rejoice with his victory.  Not that victory in the civil rights movement is at hand, but that the ultimate glass ceiling has been broken.  Not everyone will agree with all of his policies, but no one will argue that his story is indeed one than can happen no where else in the world.

Generation-WE

Filed in Economy | Education | Energy | Environment | Politics | USA politics

This video is worth a few minutes of your time.


The Generation WE movement is the largest generation in history, they are independant – politically, socially, and philosophically – and are spearheading a period of sweeping change in America and around the world. Check it out.

,

Gas Tax Holiday Hoax

Filed in Economy | Energy | Environment | Politics | USA politics

The McCain – Clinton Gas Tax Holiday is a farce and voters are beginning to realize this. Of course, Obama has been correctly outlining the problems all along. There are numerous problems with this approach even if the money would trickle into the hands of the consumers who most need it and therefore spend it on other items. At 18.4 cents per gallon, the family burning two gallons per day would receive a savings of $11 dollars per month or 5% of the cost of gasoline at the current $3.61 per gallon.

And of course, it is a proposal that few in Congress support and President Bush will veto. So, it’s a non-starter and perhaps in the eyes of two candidates a safe proposal aimed to win voter favor without having all the downsides. And there are several.

First of all, the tax generates revenue to pay for roads and bridge maintenance, which if anything is too small for our aging infrastructure. Of the three ways to pay for this, Clinton suggests taxing the windfall profits on Oil Companies while McCain says cut other spending. Let’s start with McCain. Congress has shown little appetite for cutting spending and the Whitehouse seems to agree that deficits matter not to voters. So, he is really offering the third option of borrowing to pay for this when we need to do the opposite.

Clinton wants to tax the Oil companies with a Windfall Profit tax which would do two things. First of all, it would diminish the expected returns on oil production and over the long term would decrease supply. It would in the short term put higher price pressure on Oil and with more demand coming during the summer driving season, it is more likely this added tax expense would be passed on to consumers.

If you want to help consumers and the retailers they visit, there are better ways to insure the money get to the right people. The stimulus package aims (many would argue aims poorly) to get $600 to those who need it most and are most likely to use it. The gas tax suspension would do no such thing.

And now here is the real catch. The realities of market economics cannot be suspended. Demand will increase to a point where it meets supply. Fiddling with the gas tax will not change this and the US Fuel Retail system has very little slack capacity. Therefore, supply is relatively inelastic and prices will move with demand. Bottom line, the gas tax will be eaten by the Gasoline Value Chain and consumers will be left with little in their pocket other than a higher debt and nothing done to solve the longer term energy issues. It’s bad policy, bad economics and it is time for us to show politicians, that pandering for votes is bad politics.

, ,

Is Founder Control in Public Companies a Good Thing?

Filed in Management | USA politics

Another high profile company going public has decided to maintain control while selling a majority of the economic stakes in the company to the public.   This time it is Al Gore as a founder of  Current Media.

I certainly agree, the company’s shareholders have a right to decide the control structure they want to have after a public offering.  At the end of the day, people can always choose not to be a party to it.  And the average investor (not the same as the average dollar invested) has little voice in the actions of a company.  But I still don’t like it.  I guess it comes down to creating value for all shareholders and when you remove options – and putting control in the hands of a few reduced options – you lower the value to the group as a whole.

In this case the interesting thing will be how Gore is viewed in this debate (not that I’m trying to pull Barak and Hillary into this).   In Al Gores Convenient IPO the comparision with Google focused on Gore’s holding public office and being a voice for many of the institutions who are currently fighting against these type of control structures.  I don’t think we should hold Gore or any other ex-public official to any higher standard than we hold each other.  And he should not try to tell us to do what he thinks is better for others unless he is willing to do that or more himself.

, ,

Dan Rather Praising Plagerism?

Filed in USA politics

This week’s Sunday news programs were chock full of election experts sharing some interesting comments and many that were less so. My favorite was Dan Rather’s depiction of Hillary Clinton’s closing comments at the Tuesday night Austin debate as the best statements of the campaign. Surprisingly, earlier in the day, Meet the Press demonstrated that these statements included almost word for word the same lines as one uttered by Bill Clinton sixteen years ago and another used by John Edwards in an earlier debate during this campaign. Interesting…

Looking at campaign tactics, The Clinton Campaign has Increased the Attacks on Obama which you can judge for yourself via the video here.

10 days that unexpectedly changed America

Filed in Economy | History | Science | Technology | USA politics

The excellent series on the History Channel, 10 Days that Unexpectedly Changed America, continues to be very educational and quite entertaining. Watching these 10 events, I feel compelled to add and question if perhaps other unexpected events would be in my top 10. Their events are:

  • Massacre at Mystic
  • Shays’ Rebellion: America’s First Civil War
  • Gold Rush
  • Antietam
  • The Homestead Strike
  • Murder at the Fair: The Assassination of President McKinley
  • Scopes: The Battle over America’s Soul
  • Einstein’s Letter
  • When America Was Rocked
  • Freedom Summer

After reading the list, I could not help notice the lack of inclusion of events drawing the US into a war. The sinking of the Lusitania, the attack on Pearl Harbor, and the Gulf of Tonkin. While all of these lead to war and perhaps one could predict it, the total cost and impact to the country could not have been known by anyone.

Nothing on this list leads to the US declaring its independence from England. I’m not sure I can point to a single day that led the founding fathers to make that decision and the country to make the required sacrifice. The events that come to mind fill today’s elementary school books. The Shot Heard Round the World, seems to fit the bill. However, this was in volatile New England and may have meant little to a New Yorker or Georgian. Bunker Hill (Breed’s Hill) is another event following the Boston Massacre that could have set the country on a direction of succession.

Economic events include The Federal Reserve, going off the gold starndard and, my favorite, the invention of the semiconductor which has to rank very high in terms of impact to the US and the world.

Massachusetts’ Bold Healthcare Initiative

Filed in Economy | Healthcare | Management | USA politics

or overstepping the boundaries of government? Which of these best describes the recent “Healthcare for All” bill supported by an overwhelming majority of the Massachusetts Legislature (154 to 2 in the House and 37 to 0 in the Senate) and Govenor Mitt Romney? The plan’s objective is one shared by all concerned about the unisured, responsible quality healthcare for all. It differs from many other universal plans in several ways.

The bill requires individuals to provide personal coverage, just like the state’s laws on auto coverage. Massachusetts is the first state requiring individuals to have health insurance or prove they can self-insure.

In addition, the bill provides funds to make sure those eligible for Medicare and Medicaid are enrolled. It subsidies healthcare insurance for those who don’t qualify for government programs and can’t afford insurance. The state expects to pay for the subsidies out of a $1 billion fund set aside for providing healthcare for those who can’t afford it.

The bill currently requires employers to pay $295 per unisured employee. “That’s likely to be adjusted by me,” stated Governor Romney. Will he wield the line-item veto pen?

Joe Klein at Time Magazine describes the Romney Healthcare plan this way:

Massachusetts now spends about $1 billion a year to provide emergency health care for at least 500,000 uninsured citizens. About 200,000 of those are young people, predominantly male, who are making enough money to buy health insurance but figure they don’t need it. They would be required to buy a relatively inexpensive health insurance policy, with higher deductibles and co-pays—that’s where the “mandate” comes in. Another 100,000 are extremely poor people who are eligible for Medicaid; a concerted effort would be made to bring them into the system. The remaining 200,000 are the people who have been most neglected by the system in the past: the working poor, people who have low-end service jobs or work part time for employers who don’t offer health coverage.

According to USA Today, Mass. Gov. Romney’s health care plan says everyone pays , other healthcare proposals have focused on expanding government healtcare coverage for the poor and have largely failed. Romney put distance between his proposal and the Clinton plan, saying “we don’t need Hillary-care.”

In an article by The Washington Post, Mass. Bill Requires Health Coverage, the plan goes much farther than any other state but is by no means finalized. It leaves the task of determining exactly how much some low-income residents will pay for their new, more affordable policies to a new agency that would serve as a liaison between the government, policyholders and private insurance companies.

Because of that uncertainty, some still worry that the residents required to buy insurance would not be able to.

In any event, a creative approach which does not unduly burden employers or tax payers. As long as it does not place too great a burden on the poor, then it is a very good start.

,

Security of ports, jobs or politics in port management issue?

Filed in Economy | International Politics | USA politics

Lawrence Kudlow calls the concerns over a United Arab Emirates company winning the bid to manage six America ports as nothing other than bigotry. His name for this, Islamaphobia, will not likely be added to our daily lexicon. The actions it describes are simply wrong headed.

Medicaid Needs Agressive Treatment

Filed in Economy | Healthcare | USA politics

The McKinsey Quarterly: Intensive care for Medicaid:

“Every US policy maker knows that Medicaid presents vexing budget challenges, but a new analysis suggests that its costs are becoming truly unsustainable. McKinsey estimates that even after economic growth returns to a steady pace, this government health insurance program, which primarily serves the poor, will consume more than 75 percent of all new state revenues in 10 states, including Georgia, Indiana, and Oregon, by 2009. Medicaid will cost 11 other states, including Florida, New York, and Pennsylvania, from half to 75 percent of their incremental revenues (Exhibit 1). In an additional 22 states, this one program will consume 25 to 50 cents of each new tax dollar.”

Howard Dean to Lead DNC

Filed in USA politics

Democratic National Committee

Howard Dean takes the helm of the DNC amid much speculation. Here is his message along with a few other opions.

“A message from Chairman Dean

Today your representatives elected new Party leadership. But more importantly they endorsed the idea that our Party must always be led by the people — because your participation makes the Democratic Party a powerful force for change.

Our success depends on every single one of us taking responsibility for our Party’s future. We have to commit to an active role in the political process. And we have to grow the Democratic Party in every single state so we can protect the values that bring our Party — and the vast majority of Americans — together.

We have new leadership and new energy. And thanks to your hard work and Terry McAuliffe’s solid leadership we have enormous opportunities.

Please read my plan for our Party — and send me a note about yours. Together our work will make our Party stronger. Thank you. Chairman Howard Dean”

Economist.com | Lexington

How on earth did it happen?

BACK in 2003, with Howard Dean way ahead of the pack in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, the cover of the conservative National Review pleaded “Please, nominate this man”. The Democratic caucus-goers of Iowa were sensible enough to ignore this advice, consigning Mr Dean to third place. Earlier this month, with Mr Dean once again way ahead of the pack, this time in the race for the chairmanship of the Democratic Party, the National Review tried again: “Pretty please”. Yet on Saturday the Democratic National Committee is almost certain to elect Screamin’ Howard as its new chairman.

This is an extraordinary turn of events, particularly for Bill Clinton and pragmatic New Democrats. Five years ago the Democratic Party was so firmly in the grip of those oh-so-sensible types that Jesse Jackson, the chief screamer of the time, pronounced himself a “New Democrat”. The Dean chairmanship shows how little Mr Clinton actually managed to change his party. The fact that Mr Dean is replacing Mr Clinton’s lapdog, Terry McAuliffe, makes this even clearer.

Dean named Democratic Party chief
Former presidential candidate rips Bush’s plans for America

“WASHINGTON (CNN) — Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean took the helm of the Democratic National Committee on Saturday, vowing, ‘Today will be the beginning of the re-emergence of the Democratic Party.’

Dean, 56, won the chairmanship on a voice vote of the 447-member committee after six other candidates dropped out in recent weeks.

He immediately laid out his vision for rebuilding a party clobbered in recent elections, leaving it out of power in the White House, both chambers of Congress, and a majority of governorships.

‘Republicans wandered around in the political wilderness for 40 years before they took back Congress.

‘But the reason that we lost control is because we forgot why we were entrusted with that control in the first place,’ Dean said in his acceptance speech.

‘The American people cannot afford to wait for 40 more years for us to put Washington back to work for them.’

‘It won’t take us that long — not if we stand up for what we believe in, organize at the local level, and recognize that strength does not come from the consultants down. It comes from the grass roots up.’”

Truth in Political Advertising – or not!

Filed in USA politics

FactCheck.org Social Security Ads: Risk or Protection?

In this the first round of what will surely be a contentious issue for the congress, FactCheck.org weighs in on the accuracy of current ads.

“A pro-Bush TV ad gets the central fact right about Social Security: by the time today’s young workers retire there are projected to be only two workers paying Social Security taxes for every one person receiving Social Security Benefits. Today there are 3.3 workers per beneficiary.

But a different ad opposed to Bush’s efforts uses a misleading photograph. It shows wild trading in commodities like cocoa futures to depict the risk that workers could face with private Social Security accounts. Actually, what’s being proposed is not investment commodities, but in far less risky stock and bond mutual funds, which would be broadly diversified.”

Social Security: Some Facts

Filed in Economy | USA politics

NCPA – Social Security – Facts About Social Security

Social Security reform has emerged as one of the defining issues of the 2000 election, but a number of myths and half-truths have clouded the dialogue.

Fact #1: The System Is in Trouble. Social Security is structured as a pay-as-you-go system. That means today’s workers pay the benefits for today’s retirees. In 1940, there were 42 workers per retiree; today there are three. By 2040 there will be only two (see figure). This means higher taxes for future workers.

Fact #2: The Social Security Trust Fund Cannot Pay Benefits. The trust fund only exists to perform a record-keeping function. Technically, it holds interest-bearing bonds that represent the accounting surplus of payroll taxes collected minus benefits paid. But the only way the Treasury can redeem them is if it first collects taxes or borrows money.

Fact #3: Benefits Are Not Guaranteed. In two major cases, Helvering v. Davis (1937) and Flemming v. Nestor (1960), the Supreme Court ruled that individuals have no legal claim to Social Security. As a result, Congress can reduce Social Security benefits at any time. Indeed, it already has by raising the retirement age (leading to fewer benefit checks) and imposing a special tax on benefits. Workers have no projected right in Social Security benefits simply because they have paid Social Security taxes.

Fact #4: Social Security Is a Poor Investment. In general, workers born before World War II paid significantly less in taxes than they will receive in benefits – and can expect a higher rate of return than subsequent generations. By contrast, baby boomers can expect a rate of return of less than 2 percent, and Generation Xers can expect less than 1 percent. Children born today can expect a rate of return from Social Security of almost zero, assuming that the program can pay full promised benefits.

Fact #5: Reform Works. A system that divorces us from the pay-as-you-go system, such as one with personal retirement accounts, could provide future retirees with a benefit that could provide them choice, control and security in their retirement, while protecting the government’s long-term solvency.

Source: Matt Moore, “Facts about Social Security,” Brief Analysis 341, September 26, 2000, National Center for Policy Analysis.

Social Security and Your Finances according to AARP

Filed in Economy | USA politics

The Role of Social Security in Your Financial Planning

“Fact 1: Social Security is the guaranteed part of your retirement plan.

There have been lots of questions raised about Social Security lately. And granted, it isn’t perfect. We at AARP know that it was never intended to be the sole solution to financial security in retirement. But it has been the guaranteed component of retirement. And that hasn’t changed.

The fact is, with no change at all, Social Security will be able to pay 100% of promised benefits that keep pace with the cost of living until the year 2042. After that, it will still be able to pay three-quarters of promised benefits.

Getting three-quarters wouldn’t be okay today and it won’t be fair tomorrow. At AARP, we want to be sure you reach your retirement goals. And we know that Social Security plays an important role in getting you there. Think about the role of Social Security in your own retirement planning. Then let’s start thinking about ways to fill that one quarter gap to make sure your financial security goals are within reach when you retire.

Fact 2: With Social Security in your retirement plan, you’re starting at about midfield.

Financial planning for retirement is like a football game. And you’re the one who has to go the distance and carry the ball. Only you’re not starting at zero. Thanks to the years you’ve worked, when you retire, you’re starting with about half the field already behind you.

That’s because Social Security isn’t based on your future prospects, but on your past performance. No matter who you are, Social Security is there for you because it’s based on your work history—and that just won’t change. Social Security promises that when you stop working, you’ll still have a guaranteed stream of income that, for most people, is about 40 percent of the pay you received when you were working.

One nice thing to know is that Social Security follows you wherever you go. It’s not tied to a specific job, again making it something you can count on when you retire.

Plus, it’s protected against inflation. Year after year, Social Security rises with the rising cost of living. And when you choose to retire, Social Security will continue to keep pace with the times, preventing erosion of your purchasing power. That’s why there’s a cost of living increase every year—so 20 years from now, you aren’t stuck trying to make up for the fact that what used to cover a mortgage doesn’t even cover a car payment.

You may outlive your savings, but your Social Security is always there. It gives you a safe, unshakable financial base to complement a private pension, an IRA, a 401(k), or other savings, all of which, together, put you solidly in the scoring position when you retire.

Fact 3: Social Security is on the sidelines, backing you up, while you’re working.

If you’re still working, you probably don’t realize Social Security is protecting you right now. Thanks to Social Security, you have disability and survivor insurance for you and your family. No one likes to think about the unexpected realities life can bring, but we all know bad things can happen to good people. In the event of a worker’s death or disability, Social Security is there to step in and provide for that worker and his or her family.

With Social Security, you’re that much closer to your goals and that much more secure. Today. And every day.”

A Plan for Reforming Social Security

Filed in Economy | USA politics

The 6.2 Percent Solution: A Plan for Reforming Social Security:

“For the past several years there has been a growing consensus about the need to reform Social Security. Now, however, the debate has advanced to the point where it becomes important to move beyond generalities and provide specific proposals for transforming Social Security to a system of individual accounts. The Cato Project on Social Security Choice, therefore, has developed a proposal to give workers ownership of and control over their retirement funds.

Under this proposal:

* Individuals would be allowed to divert their half (6.2 percentage points) of the payroll tax to individually owned, privately invested accounts. Those who chose to do so would agree to forgo all future accrual of retirement benefits under the traditional Social Security system.
* The remaining 6.2 percentage points of payroll taxes would be used to pay transition costs and to fund disability and survivors’ benefits.
* Workers who chose the individual account option would receive a ‘recognition bond’ based on the accrued value of their lifetimeto- date benefits. Those bonds, redeemable at the worker’s retirement, would be fully tradable in secondary markets.
* Those who wished to remain in the traditional Social Security system would be free to do so, accepting a level of benefits payable with the current level of revenue.”

The full text of the argument Tanner makes for this proposal can be found in
SSP No. 32.

Facts Don’t Line up for Bush or MoveOn

Filed in Economy | USA politics

FactCheck.org Bush’s State of the Union: Social Security “Bankruptcy?”:

FactCheck.org MoveOn.org Social Security Ad

The folks at FactCheck.org are equally critical of Bush’s use of agressive projections and language as he pushed his plan to revamp Social Security in his State of the Union address and MoveOn.org’s use of false claims regarding cuts in benefit payments.

“In his State of the Union Address, President Bush said again that the Social Security system is headed for ‘bankruptcy,’ a term that could give the wrong idea. Actually, even if it goes ‘bankrupt’ a few decades from now, the system would still be able to pay about three-quarters of the benefits now promised.

Bush also made his proposed private Social Security accounts sound like a sure thing, which they are not. He said they ‘will’ grow fast enough to provide a better return than the present system. History suggests that will be so, but nobody can predict what stock and bond markets will do in the future.”

Moveon.org
“MoveOn.org launched a false TV ad in the districts of several House members, claiming through images and words that President Bush plans to cut Social Security benefits nearly in half. Showing white-haired workers lifting boxes, mopping floors, shoveling and laundering, the ad says ‘it won’t be long before America introduces the working retirement.’”

,

Do the Pharma Business Models Add Up?

Filed in Economy | Healthcare | Pharmaceuticals | USA politics

Do Pharmaceutical Companies Have an Effective Business Models?

Has the Pharmaceutical Blockbuster Model Gone Bust?
Bain & Company Press Release 12/8/2003

Rebuilding Big Pharma’s Business Model
In Vivo 11/1/2003
by James Gilbert, Preston Henske and Ashish Singh

The blockbuster business model that underpinned Big Pharma’s success is now irreparably broken. The industry needs a new approach.

, , ,

The Value of Offshoring

Filed in Economy | International Politics | Technology | USA politics | Venture capital

Offshoring – Relocating the back office
Dec 11th 2003 From The Economist print edition

The Organizational Implications of Offshore Outsourcing
24 October 2003
Diane Morello

Acrobat Version

Offshoring: Is it a Win-Win Game?
McKinsey Global Institute
August, 2003

The Irony of Outsourcing
By Kevin Laws on November 18, 2003 09:03 PM
supports the argument that economic activity flowing to the most efficient provider creates the greatest total value and in the long run the greatest value for each country involved. He points out the engineers who “thought” manufacturing workers out of jobs are now seeing their own jobs reduced and sent offshore.

, , , ,

Reforming Healthcare: Cost vs. Price

Filed in Economy | Healthcare | USA politics

This posting by Kevin Brancato suggest that our view of healthcare cost in the US is distorted. While the data seems to lead to the conclusion that we’re buying much more healthcare at sky-high prices, economists doubt the validity and applicability of the offical data because it does not appropriately adjust for quality.

, , ,

Corporate Social Responsibility

Filed in Ethics | Management | USA politics

BusinessPundit talks about this movement which according to The Economist is
One of the biggest corporate fads of the 1990s—less overpowering, no doubt, than dotcom mania, but also longer-lived—was the flowering of “corporate social responsibility” (CSR). The idea that it is not enough for firms to make money for their owners is one that you might expect to be an article of faith among anti-globalists and eco-warriors. Many bosses now share, or say they share, the same conviction.

, ,

Misunderstanding the Internet

Filed in Economy | Publishing | USA politics

TM Lutas provides an alternative economic analysis of the Internet to those provided by Adam Thierer at Cato, Howard Dean’s Principles for an Internet Policy, David Weinberger’s analysis of the Cato article, and Lawrence Lessig’s commentary on same.

, ,

TOP