<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nesmith&#039;s Notes &#187; taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dwaynenesmith.com/blog/archives/tag/taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dwaynenesmith.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:10:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Colorado Tax Bill HB-1192 is a Bad Idea…</title>
		<link>http://dwaynenesmith.com/blog/archives/2010/02/why-hb-1192-is-a-bad-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://dwaynenesmith.com/blog/archives/2010/02/why-hb-1192-is-a-bad-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dwayne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwaynenesmith.com/blog/archives/2010/02/why-hb-1192-is-a-bad-idea/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seth Levine has posted Marion Jenkins’ detailed rebuttal to HB 1192.  Mr. Jenkins suggests this tax legislation should be opposed due to a wide range of problems, including it being a new tax which should go before all voters to the complexity in determining when a lump of software code is deemed “standard” and subject [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dwaynenesmith.com/blog/archives/2010/02/why-hb-1192-is-a-bad-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

